15. Deci, Koestner, and Ryan’s (1999) meta-analysis on the effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation indicates that:
15. Deci, Koestner, and Ryan’s (1999) meta-analysis on the effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation indicates that:
1 point
Unexpected rewards do not significantly undermine intrinsic motivation.
Non-contingent rewards are more detrimental to intrinsic motivation than rewards contingent on engagement or performance.
Verbal, but not tangible, rewards undermine intrinsic motivation.
==========================
16. Which of the following was NOT found by Murayama and colleagues’ (2010) in their neuroimaging study of the undermining effect?
1 point
In the first condition, there is a lot of activation in the bilateral striatum occurring in the reward condition (e.g., financial reward for response), but there is also activation in the control condition (e.g., not getting rewards) because participants found the game rewarding and interesting.
Activation in the bilateral striatum only occurs for the reward condition.
When brought back into the lab for a second session, this time with no rewards for any participants, those who had previously received rewards for their performance showed the lowest levels of activation in the bilateral striatum.
In looking at the lateral prefrontal cortex, you see the same pattern of effects found as those in the bilateral striatum area of the brain for these experiments.